Rainy Sunday Whets Shutterbug's Appetite
That could be a headline in the local fishwrapper, the Rochester Dimbulb and Comical (or the Democrat and Chronicle as it's known by the less sardonically inclined). Maybe I have a future in the newspaper business. Does the job of headline writer pay very well, I wonder? And do they hire people who deride prospective employers?
Well, I'm writing this a little late. I had to do some work tonight (the kind I actually get paid for), since there doesn't seem to be enough hours in the work week to get everything done that needs doing. I'm not going to expend bytes discussing work, though. I'm here for the birds, and photography, and photographing birds.
It rained today. Pretty much all day in fact, so getting back out to Lyndonville to see the Northern Hawk Owl (Surnia ulula) was out of the question, much as I'd have enjoyed another look at the bird. The day wasn't a total loss though. One of the neighborhood Pileated woodpeckers (Dryocopus pileatus) made a suet stop early in the afternoon. I heard the distinctive call that announced her presence, and since I hadn't had a chance to shoot a Pileated with my new Canon (wow-- doesn't that have a violent ring to it?), I figured I'd take a few minutes out of my housecleaning to see what my EOS 20D could do.
The gray sky and rain made for some dim lighting, and even at ISO 400 with the aperture wide open at f5.6, the best shutter speed I could get was a terrapin-esque 1/50thsec. exposure. Now, the feeding Pileated is in almost constant motion, so many of the shots I took featured the woodpecker's blurry head, but there were a few wherein my shutter finger and her bobbing head found synchronicity, so here they are:
8 megapixels worth of resolution is good for a lot more detail than the shots I got with my DX6490! I enjoyed this shot of the back of her head, because it shows off the tight point of her pileation so well:
After she ate she made a quick getaway up the trunk of a silver maple:
For that last shot I bumped the ISO up to 800 to see what kind of signal noise I'd get. At full resolution, the image showed some well-ordered noise, but nothing like the artifacts at ISO 400 or even 200 on my Kodak camera. This Canon is the real deal, and I can see that I'm going to have to work hard to be worthy of its capabilities.




